您现在的位置:新闻中心--News
News
SUPER TECH WIN THE PATENT LITIGATION
发布日期:2017-6-2  来源:  查看:181 [返回]

Beijing Higher people’s Court dismissed Panasonic’s appeal,  Fujian Super Tech Advanced Material Co., Ltd. won the patent infringement dispute.

On January 14, 2014, Panasonic Corporation (hereafter "Panasonic" for short) filed a civil lawsuit against Fujian Super Tech Advanced Material Co., Ltd. (hereafter “SuperTech ” for short) to the Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court,  suing that the " Vacuum Insulation Panel" produced by SuperTech  was infringing its patent No. 819446.7, whose invention title was 【heat insulation box and vacuum heat insulation material used therefor】

On March 10, 2014, Super Tech submitted a "request for invalidation" to China SIPO Patent Reexamination Committee,  stating that Panasonic's patent No. 819446.7  claims 17 to 25 does not possess the novelty or inventiveness and not in conformity with the relevant provisions of the patent law, the above claims should be invalidated. On July 18, 2014,  China SIPO Patent Reexamination Committee made decision  No. 23427th, that patent No. 819446.7 claims 17-25  by Panasonic,  were invalid.

After that, Panasonic put forward the application to withdraw the prosecution against Super Techl  from  Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court.

On October 31, 2014, Panasonic brought a suit in the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court, requesting for revocation of No. 23427th invalidation review decision made by SIPO Patent Reexamination Committee and confirming  its invention patent No. 819446.7 claims 17-25 all valid.  SuperTech  was sued as the  third party.  On March 18, 2016, Beijing First Intermediate People's Court made the administrative decision of No. 569th (2015)  and dismissed  the appeal by Panasonic.

On April 15, 2016, Panasonic brought a suit in  Beijing Higher People's court, requesting revocation of the Beijing first intermediate people's Court (2015) No. 569th administrative judgment, revocation of No. 23427th invalidation review decision made by SIPO Patent Reexamination Committee. SuperTech attended the litigation as the third party.  On May 8, 2017, Beijing Higher People's Court made (2016) No. 2904  final administrative decision , dismissed  Panasonic’s appeal,  upheld the original judgment.  This judgment is final.

The case, which lasted for three years and four months, ended with the triumph of Super Tech . In the meantime, SuperTech  withstood tremendous pressure, through unremitting efforts and practical work, defended its own rights, meanwhile safeguarded the dignity of Chinese enterprises.